The Rating System:
I like Washington Post food critic Tom Sietsema’s rating system, so I’ll be using that. Half stars indicate a rating between the descriptions below.
* (1 star) Satisfactory
Restaurants that are useful to know about if you are nearby; they may have only a few dishes or a single quality, such as a view or scene, to distinguish them.
** (2 stars) Good
Restaurants with generally appealing cooking, service and settings; they tend to be worth driving across town for.
*** (3 stars) Excellent
Rewarding destinations, no matter where you’re coming from; they typically blend high-quality cooking with environs and service to match.
**** (4 stars) Superlative
An unsurpassed experience; these restaurants do what they do extraordinarily well.
Ratings are based primarily on food quality but take into account service and ambience. Restaurants that earn no stars are rated Poor.
6 responses so far ↓
1 Back to Business - Oysi Oysi // Dec 11, 2008 at 7:58 pm
[...] 1 star (out of a possible 4) [...]
2 $10 Downtown Lunch Smackdown - Joe Forte’s // Jan 5, 2009 at 5:15 pm
[...] **2 stars (out of a possible 4) [...]
3 Good Food - Bad Policy // Jan 14, 2009 at 5:14 pm
[...] ** 2 Stars (out of a possible 4) [...]
4 Ebisu on Robson // Feb 13, 2009 at 4:51 pm
[...] ****4 Stars (out of a possible 4) [...]
5 Brunch Series Begins // Apr 27, 2009 at 4:02 pm
[...] Zero Stars (Out of a possible 4) [...]
6 Chow Pleases // May 21, 2009 at 2:25 pm
[...] ****Stars (out of a possible 4) [...]
Leave a Comment